Evaluation System

Evaluation process
Initial editorial review: Verification of compliance with the journal's standards and thematic relevance.
Peer review: Double-blind peer review system, where neither the authors nor the reviewers know each other's identity.
Editorial decision: Based on the reviewers' reports, the editorial board will make one of the following decisions:
o    Acceptance without modifications
o    Acceptance with minor modifications
o    Acceptance conditional on major modifications
o    Rejection
4.    Final version: Authors must submit the final version of the manuscript incorporating the reviewers' suggestions within the established deadline.
Ethical considerations
1.    Originality and plagiarism: Authors must guarantee that their work is original and that any material from other authors is duly cited.
Authorship: All signatories must have contributed substantially to the work and assume public responsibility for its content.
Conflicts of interest: Authors must declare any conflicts of interest that may influence the interpretation of their results.
Research involving human subjects: Studies involving human subjects must be approved by an ethics committee and respect the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.